<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony Cybershot R1 Is That A Good Relieable Camera ? Can You Recommend It Or Not ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buycybershot.com/sony-cybershot-r1-is-that-a-good-relieable-camera-can-you-recommend-it-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buycybershot.com/sony-cybershot-r1-is-that-a-good-relieable-camera-can-you-recommend-it-or-not</link>
	<description>Review and Buy Sony Cybershot  Now!!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:51:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Morey000</title>
		<link>http://www.buycybershot.com/sony-cybershot-r1-is-that-a-good-relieable-camera-can-you-recommend-it-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>Morey000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buycybershot.com/sony-cybershot-r1-is-that-a-good-relieable-camera-can-you-recommend-it-or-not#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a great camera- for what it is.
The R1 tries to  bridge the gap between a digicam and a DSLR, and I think you pretty much get the worst of both worlds.  The image quality is quite good- but you&#039;ve got a limited zoom range and no interchangeable lens options.  it&#039;s also no lightweight (it&#039;s pretty big).
I&#039;m pretty sure that this camera is being discontinued.
If you want a DSLR- there are many good options, that are better than the R1.  If you want a compact digicam- then get one.  If you want this camera- well, it&#039;s the only one like it.  DSLR performance with video capability and real time EVF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a great camera- for what it is.<br />
The R1 tries to  bridge the gap between a digicam and a DSLR, and I think you pretty much get the worst of both worlds.  The image quality is quite good- but you&#8217;ve got a limited zoom range and no interchangeable lens options.  it&#8217;s also no lightweight (it&#8217;s pretty big).<br />
I&#8217;m pretty sure that this camera is being discontinued.<br />
If you want a DSLR- there are many good options, that are better than the R1.  If you want a compact digicam- then get one.  If you want this camera- well, it&#8217;s the only one like it.  DSLR performance with video capability and real time EVF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgp714</title>
		<link>http://www.buycybershot.com/sony-cybershot-r1-is-that-a-good-relieable-camera-can-you-recommend-it-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1989</link>
		<dc:creator>sgp714</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buycybershot.com/sony-cybershot-r1-is-that-a-good-relieable-camera-can-you-recommend-it-or-not#comment-1989</guid>
		<description>A great website to check out for questions regarding virtually any digital camera is www.dpreview.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great website to check out for questions regarding virtually any digital camera is <a href="http://www.dpreview.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panacea</title>
		<link>http://www.buycybershot.com/sony-cybershot-r1-is-that-a-good-relieable-camera-can-you-recommend-it-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1988</link>
		<dc:creator>Panacea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buycybershot.com/sony-cybershot-r1-is-that-a-good-relieable-camera-can-you-recommend-it-or-not#comment-1988</guid>
		<description>I have a Sony DSC-R1.  It&#039;s a superior camera.  However, I paid roughly $800, after the $100 rebate Sony offered.http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/sony/d…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Sony DSC-R1.  It&#8217;s a superior camera.  However, I paid roughly $800, after the $100 rebate Sony offered.http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/sony/d…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: american</title>
		<link>http://www.buycybershot.com/sony-cybershot-r1-is-that-a-good-relieable-camera-can-you-recommend-it-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator>american</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buycybershot.com/sony-cybershot-r1-is-that-a-good-relieable-camera-can-you-recommend-it-or-not#comment-1987</guid>
		<description>I have a Cyber-shot 4.1 megapixels, which I love. The quality of the photos is pretty good, although that&#039;s all a function of the photographer in many cases! It doesn&#039;t seem to eat batteries too much, either. 
Based on my experience with Sony products, I would probably buy the R1 if I were in the market for a new camera. I looked for it on line and you can get one for as low as $650.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Cyber-shot 4.1 megapixels, which I love. The quality of the photos is pretty good, although that&#8217;s all a function of the photographer in many cases! It doesn&#8217;t seem to eat batteries too much, either.<br />
Based on my experience with Sony products, I would probably buy the R1 if I were in the market for a new camera. I looked for it on line and you can get one for as low as $650.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMG, I ♥ PONIES!!1</title>
		<link>http://www.buycybershot.com/sony-cybershot-r1-is-that-a-good-relieable-camera-can-you-recommend-it-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1986</link>
		<dc:creator>OMG, I ♥ PONIES!!1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buycybershot.com/sony-cybershot-r1-is-that-a-good-relieable-camera-can-you-recommend-it-or-not#comment-1986</guid>
		<description>It gets great reviews but that price is insane. It only costs $800 in the USA.
Here are two in-depth reviews:http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydscr…http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_revi…
Even for $800, I wouldn&#039;t get the R1 myself however. For the same price I&#039;d get a Nikon D50 with the Nikon 18-70mm lens.
For all the great features of the R1, it&#039;s still just a point &amp; shoot. It uses an electronic viewfinder for example. This means that what you see in the viewfinder, actually happened 1/10th second ago. So when you press the shutter button, you&#039;re too late. You will have a terrible time with the R1 with candids and action shots.
The Nikon D50 is a digital SLR camera. It&#039;s responsive. Fast. The down side of the D50 is that you get less megapixels (6 MP vs. 10 MP on the Sony), and with the lens I suggested, you have a tiny bit less range. The Nikon 18-70 lens actually behaves like 27-105mm on digital Nikon bodies, vs. the Sony R1 which has a 24-120mm lens.
I tell you this, because I used a high-end pont &amp; shoot camera myself for two years, and became so frustrated by the limitations that I upgraded to a dSLR anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It gets great reviews but that price is insane. It only costs $800 in the USA.<br />
Here are two in-depth reviews:http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydscr…http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_revi…<br />
Even for $800, I wouldn&#8217;t get the R1 myself however. For the same price I&#8217;d get a Nikon D50 with the Nikon 18-70mm lens.<br />
For all the great features of the R1, it&#8217;s still just a point &#038; shoot. It uses an electronic viewfinder for example. This means that what you see in the viewfinder, actually happened 1/10th second ago. So when you press the shutter button, you&#8217;re too late. You will have a terrible time with the R1 with candids and action shots.<br />
The Nikon D50 is a digital SLR camera. It&#8217;s responsive. Fast. The down side of the D50 is that you get less megapixels (6 MP vs. 10 MP on the Sony), and with the lens I suggested, you have a tiny bit less range. The Nikon 18-70 lens actually behaves like 27-105mm on digital Nikon bodies, vs. the Sony R1 which has a 24-120mm lens.<br />
I tell you this, because I used a high-end pont &#038; shoot camera myself for two years, and became so frustrated by the limitations that I upgraded to a dSLR anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

